Frequently asked questions on domestic debt restructuring

14 September by Ahilan Kadirgamar , Madhulika Gunawardena , Shafiya Rafaithu , Sinthuja Sritharan


Sri Lanka is one of over 70 countries in debt distress in the Global South, and should not meekly follow the IMF and serve the interests of global finance capital. Rather, Sri Lanka should work with other countries to demand adequate laws and forums for restructuring external debt and new avenues for development finance, and thus contribute towards framing a new global financial architecture



What is meant by debt restructuring?

Why does Sri Lanka have to restructure its external debt, and what is the role of the IMF IMF
International Monetary Fund
Along with the World Bank, the IMF was founded on the day the Bretton Woods Agreements were signed. Its first mission was to support the new system of standard exchange rates.

When the Bretton Wood fixed rates system came to an end in 1971, the main function of the IMF became that of being both policeman and fireman for global capital: it acts as policeman when it enforces its Structural Adjustment Policies and as fireman when it steps in to help out governments in risk of defaulting on debt repayments.

As for the World Bank, a weighted voting system operates: depending on the amount paid as contribution by each member state. 85% of the votes is required to modify the IMF Charter (which means that the USA with 17,68% % of the votes has a de facto veto on any change).

The institution is dominated by five countries: the United States (16,74%), Japan (6,23%), Germany (5,81%), France (4,29%) and the UK (4,29%).
The other 183 member countries are divided into groups led by one country. The most important one (6,57% of the votes) is led by Belgium. The least important group of countries (1,55% of the votes) is led by Gabon and brings together African countries.

http://imf.org
?

Is DDR necessary, and what does the IMF demand?

Why are external bondholders pushing for DDR?

  • Sri Lanka has a large stock of external debt, of which commercial borrowing is 41%. Some of these bondholders are strategically holding out and demanding comparable treatment between external and domestic debt. They want domestic pressure against haircuts on domestic debt, leading to lower levels of haircuts on external debt.
  • Domestic debt cannot be compared with the external debt of private bondholders, because the latter got much higher returns at higher risk, thus they were already compensated by high returns. However, the Government is overly eager to satisfy external bondholders and the IMF, which is the ultimate defender of global finance capital, as the Government wants to be able to borrow again in the international capital markets.

How does DDR affect EPF and retirement funds, and what is the role of the Central Bank?

How does DDR impact the life savings of working people?

Due to currency depreciation and the price hikes in 2022, the real value of the EPF and most retirement funds has decreased by over 40%. Anyone accessing their funds after 2022 is already incurring a substantial loss.

With DDR and reduced interest earnings, the EPF and many retirement funds can lose 29% of their value in 10 years and 47% of their value over the 16-year period of DDR lasting through 2038. The value of retirement funds over the last five years has averaged 17.7% of GDP and with an annual decline of 0.5% of GDP in the next 16 years, it would decline to 9.4% of GDP. The working people in the private formal sector depend on these funds as their only social security; this will have adverse consequences on their standard of living during their retirement life.

What if the IMF program and debt restructuring fail, and how does it affect the national budget?

  • The only alternative to prevent another default is to obtain a significant reduction in external debt and if possible debt cancellation.
  • Given the stringent conditions of the IMF program and the presumed low levels of haircut on debt restructuring, Sri Lanka may again default on its external debt in the future. The external debt GFN target of 4.5% of GDP may put pressure on the country’s foreign reserves when foreign earnings are inadequate to meet the import bill and external debt servicing needs. The Government may attempt a fire sale of assets through privatisation to bring in foreign earnings, harming the quality and increasing charges on public services, including electricity, water, transport, education etc.
  • Reducing the total GFN through DDR and constraining fiscal policy through IMF-prescribed austerity will have significant implications on budgetary allocations necessary to provide relief to people and stimulus to address the economic crisis.
  • The IMF is pushing for laws, such as Public Finance Management (PFM) laws, that prevent the government from deficit financing to even address major shocks in the economy and put working people at the mercy of markets.

What are some alternative policies to address the debt crisis?

  • DDR should be rejected and unsustainable external debt should be cancelled.
  • The proposed DDR reduces the returns on retirement funds by 0.5% of GDP each year, affecting the mass of working people in the country. Even if the Government believes that there is no alternative to DDR, it could have considered wealth taxes equivalent to 0.5% of GDP with the super-rich taking up the burden.
  • Debt restructuring based on the IMF Debt Sustainability Analysis and austerity measures in favour of creditors should not undermine the economic recovery of the country and relief to the people devastated by the crisis. Alternative and sustainable development financing sources are needed as opposed to extractive commercial borrowing. Investment in local development should ensure self-sufficiency in food and other essentials.

What lessons can we draw from the debt restructuring process?

The Government can betray working people’s concerns during a crisis; it has not provided relief to working people and is destroying their savings and retirement funds. Working people should have control over their retirement funds and manage it through their representative trade unions. Such worker-controlled retirement funds can also ensure that their savings are invested to increase employment and livelihoods.

  • The DDR process affecting retirement funds should be rejected at all cost, and if the Government proceeds to levy the increased 30% tax on retirement funds, a campaign to end taxation on retirement funds through a new tax law should be launched by electing a new parliament that would heed working people’s concerns.
  • Sri Lanka’s economic trajectory with commercial borrowing in the international capital markets has been devastating for the working people. Given this experience, ensure a national consensus, including a possible law, to deny future borrowing through International Sovereign Bonds.
  • Sri Lanka is one of over 70 countries in debt distress in the Global South, and should not meekly follow the IMF and serve the interests of global finance capital. Rather, Sri Lanka should work with other countries to demand adequate laws and forums for restructuring external debt and new avenues for development finance, and thus contribute towards framing a new global financial architecture.

(Ahilan Kadirgamar is a Senior Lecturer, University of Jaffna. Madhulika Gunawardena, Shafiya Rafaithu, and Sinthuja Sritharan are part of the Young Researchers Network. The research is supported by the Law and Society Trust.)


Source : Daily FT

Other articles in English by Ahilan Kadirgamar (10)

CADTM

COMMITTEE FOR THE ABOLITION OF ILLEGITIMATE DEBT

8 rue Jonfosse
4000 - Liège- Belgique

00324 60 97 96 80
info@cadtm.org

cadtm.org