Committee for the Abolition of Illegitimate Debt

According to Dawn, “in February this year, annualised food inflation Inflation The cumulated rise of prices as a whole (e.g. a rise in the price of petroleum, eventually leading to a rise in salaries, then to the rise of other prices, etc.). Inflation implies a fall in the value of money since, as time goes by, larger sums are required to purchase particular items. This is the reason why corporate-driven policies seek to keep inflation down. shot up to 41.9 per cent in urban areas and 47 pc in rural areas of Pakistan. In February last year, these readings stood at 14.3 pc and 14. 6pc, respectively. This means that food inflation — or the pace of increase in the prices of food items — has more than tripled in just one year.”

In April 2023, Pakistan’s reported foreign exchange reserves were hovering at $4 billion, insufficient to pay even one month’s import bill.

This enormous external debt places significant repayment pressure on the country. Pakistan is required to repay $77.5 billion in external debt between April 2023 and June 2026. This is a significant burden for a $376 billion economy. The biggest repayments will be made to Chinese financial institutions, private creditors, and Saudi Arabia during the following three years. Pakistan had $126.3 billion in external debt and liabilities Liabilities The part of the balance-sheet that comprises the resources available to a company (equity provided by the partners, provisions for risks and charges, debts). as of December 2022. Nearly 77% of this debt, or $97.5 billion, is owed directly by the government of Pakistan to various creditors; an additional $7.9 billion is owing to multilateral creditors by government-controlled public sector firms.

(Source : Dawn)

Current Account deficit
According to State Bank of Pakistan data issued on May 17, the economy posted a current account surplus for the second consecutive month in April, reducing the existing fiscal year’s current account deficit by a staggering 76% to $3.3 billion in July-April compared to the same period previous year.

Figures in USD million. Source: Trading Economics

The reduction was caused by a $13.5 billion decrease in imports, a direct result of the 2022 import ban on luxury items and non-essential raw materials. While it may appear to be encouraging, the country’s current account advantage may actually be detrimental.

The initial impact of the raw material import prohibition was in the manufacturing sector, which accounted for 19% of GDP GDP
Gross Domestic Product Gross Domestic Product is an aggregate measure of total production within a given territory equal to the sum of the gross values added. The measure is notoriously incomplete; for example it does not take into account any activity that does not enter into a commercial exchange. The GDP takes into account both the production of goods and the production of services. Economic growth is defined as the variation of the GDP from one period to another. in 2022. According to Pakistan’s Ministry of Finance’s April Monthly Report, the Large-Scale Manufacturing (LSM) sector decreased 5.56% between July 2012 and February 2023, compared to a 7.8% expansion during the same time last year. Atif Rehman Mian, a Pakistani-American economist at Priceton University, opines that the government’s restrictions on imports of raw materials needed for production and export will eventually cut the country’s production, and a lower GDP will make it more difficult to pay off the debt, leading to more devaluation Devaluation A lowering of the exchange rate of one currency as regards others.  and more misery.

Currency depreciation, in fact, has the terrible ability to increase industrial prices and diminish the intensity of capacity utilisation. In truth, the Pakistani Rupee has been progressively losing value in relation to the US dollar in recent years.

( Source: Twitter)

IMF IMF
International Monetary Fund Along with the World Bank, the IMF was founded on the day the Bretton Woods Agreements were signed. Its first mission was to support the new system of standard exchange rates.

When the Bretton Wood fixed rates system came to an end in 1971, the main function of the IMF became that of being both policeman and fireman for global capital: it acts as policeman when it enforces its Structural Adjustment Policies and as fireman when it steps in to help out governments in risk of defaulting on debt repayments.

As for the World Bank, a weighted voting system operates: depending on the amount paid as contribution by each member state. 85% of the votes is required to modify the IMF Charter (which means that the USA with 17,68% % of the votes has a de facto veto on any change).

The institution is dominated by five countries: the United States (16,74%), Japan (6,23%), Germany (5,81%), France (4,29%) and the UK (4,29%).
The other 183 member countries are divided into groups led by one country. The most important one (6,57% of the votes) is led by Belgium. The least important group of countries (1,55% of the votes) is led by Gabon and brings together African countries.

http://imf.org bailout
The International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) enters the stage in this setting as the supreme saviour. On July 12, 2023, the IMF Executive Board agreed a 9-month Stand-By Arrangement (SBA) for Pakistan in the sum of SDR2,250 million (about $3 billion, or 111 percent of quota) to assist the authorities’ economic stabilisation programme.

The agreement of the Executive Board allows for an immediate disbursement of SDR894 million (about US$1.2 billion). The remaining funds will be phased in throughout the course of the programme, with two quarterly evaluations. Subsequent to the Executive Board discussion, Kristalina Georgieva, Managing Director and Chair, made the following statement: “Pakistan’s economy was hit hard by significant shocks last year, notably the spillovers from the severe impacts of floods, the large volatility in commodity prices, and the tightening of external and domestic financing conditions. These factors together with uneven policy implementation under the EFF combined to halt the post-pandemic recovery, sharply increase inflation, and significantly depleted internal and external buffers. The authorities’ new StandBy Arrangement, implemented faithfully, offers Pakistan an opportunity to regain macroeconomic stability and address these imbalances through consistent policy implementation.”

An upbeat Shehbaz Sharif, Pakistan’s Prime Minister, said the bailout was a significant step forward in attempts to stabilise the economy. “It bolsters Pakistan’s economic position to overcome immediate to medium-term economic challenges, giving next government the fiscal space to chart the way forward." The country’s Finance Minister, Ishaq Dar, felt that “things are now moving in the right direction.”

According to Lahore-based economist Ali Khizr, “the currency and inflation could have gone out of control” had the government and IMF not reached this agreement. He also said, “the absence of foreign exchange could have resulted in massive shortages of fuel, food, medicine and other items. Things are likely to improve now – as the currency will stabilise and inflation will slowly come down in the short to medium term.”

Dissent from the ground
However, not everyone in the country or overseas shares this upbeat outlook. Abdul Khaliq, CADTM Pakistan, observed that the latest financial lifeline – and its reliance on hardline countries for support – wouldn’t spur political reforms needed to enable stability. He further said, “Pakistan has sought a bailout agreement with the IMF desperately, but it is not a way out of the crisis. The policies funded by the Fund have worsened Pakistan’s food and energy dependency and insecurity, increased inequality and reinforced the trend towards an authoritarian regime. A comprehensive debt relief followed by establishment of parliamentary Debt Audit Commission would be helpful to get Pakistan out of this worst economic crisis.”

In this context, it is important to note that, since 1958, 11 years after the birth of the nation, Pakistan has entered into 22 agreements with the IMF. Since the government borrowed to deal with worldwide oil price rises in the 1970s, Pakistan became heavily indebted. People have suffered as a result of the massive external debt ever since. Successive administrations have sought IMF rescue assistance on an ongoing basis. These bailout loans have ensured that debt carries down through generations, providing the IMF immense leverage Leverage This is the ratio between funds borrowed for investment and the personal funds or equity that backs them up. A company may have borrowed much more than its capitalized value, in which case it is said to be ’highly leveraged’. The more highly a company is leveraged, the higher the risk associated with lending to the company; but higher also are the possible profits that it may realise as compared with its own value. over Pakistan’s progress through the economic conditions imposed on the country.

Source : Synergia Foundation)

Lending and grants have also been used to assist Western-backed military regimes in Pakistan, such as those of General Musharraf (1999-2008) and Zia-ul-Haq (1977-1988). Earlier, IMF loans were liberally granted to the General Ayub Khan regime (1958–1968). This raises concerns about the odious nature of a significant portion of Pakistan’s external debt.

Source : The Express Tribune)

Tess Woolfenden, Senior Policy Officer Head of Policy at Debt Justice remarked, “the IMF is continuing to follow its flawed strategy of bailing out previous lenders, while forcing austerity on the people of Pakistan. This perpetuates Pakistan’s decades long debt crisis, which is worsening because of the impacts of climate change caused by rich people, such as 2022’s devastating floods. Instead, Pakistan needs debt cancellation from all its creditors, alongside grant based finance to cope with the impacts of climate change.”

Indeed, debt-ridden Pakistan will become the world’s fourth largest IMF borrower after getting a new loan of USD 3 billion over the next nine months under a standby agreement with the global lender. Pakistan, which is experiencing its worst economic crisis in history, was earlier rated fifth in the list of countries with the largest borrowing from the Fund on March 31, 2023.

A large portion of Pakistan’s debt, almost $45 billion, is owed to multilateral organisations. The World Bank World Bank
WB The World Bank was founded as part of the new international monetary system set up at Bretton Woods in 1944. Its capital is provided by member states’ contributions and loans on the international money markets. It financed public and private projects in Third World and East European countries.

It consists of several closely associated institutions, among which :

1. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD, 189 members in 2017), which provides loans in productive sectors such as farming or energy ;

2. The International Development Association (IDA, 159 members in 1997), which provides less advanced countries with long-term loans (35-40 years) at very low interest (1%) ;

3. The International Finance Corporation (IFC), which provides both loan and equity finance for business ventures in developing countries.

As Third World Debt gets worse, the World Bank (along with the IMF) tends to adopt a macro-economic perspective. For instance, it enforces adjustment policies that are intended to balance heavily indebted countries’ payments. The World Bank advises those countries that have to undergo the IMF’s therapy on such matters as how to reduce budget deficits, round up savings, enduce foreign investors to settle within their borders, or free prices and exchange rates.

($18 billion), the Asian Development Bank ($15 billion), and the IMF ($7.6 billion) are Islamabad’s biggest multilateral creditors. Pakistan also owes considerably to the Islamic Development Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.

Farooq Tariq, General Secretary of the Pakistan Kissan Rabita Committee, a network of 26 peasant organizations feels that while the government has been spared for the moment, but not its people. According to him, “The IMF conditionalities imposed on Pakistan may not have parallels internationally. The IMF has exerted significant influence over the Pakistani ruling class, requiring them to comply with every demand. This situation is also influenced by the geopolitical dynamics at play, with China being Pakistan’s largest economic partner. Through the Pakistan-China Economic Corridor (CPEC), China has invested over $25 billion, out of a promised $60 billion, in Pakistan, primarily in the form of loans. The IMF feared that Pakistan might utilise the IMF loans to repay the Chinese debts.

Despite last year’s devastating floods, which resulted in a loss of $30 billion, the strict IMF conditionalities have been enforced without considering these challenges. The government has failed to adequately rehabilitate flood victims, with over 4 million people still residing in roadside camps. Furthermore, the promises made to Pakistan at COP 27 under the “loss and damage agreement” have yet to materialise.”

A hike in power tariffs followed hard on the heels of the agreement. The IMF has reportedly ordered Pakistan to raise power and gas prices. According to the agreement, Pakistan’s monetary policy must be tight in order to reduce inflation in the country. Needless to say, the Fund applauded Pakistan’s hike in interest rates Interest rates When A lends money to B, B repays the amount lent by A (the capital) as well as a supplementary sum known as interest, so that A has an interest in agreeing to this financial operation. The interest is determined by the interest rate, which may be high or low. To take a very simple example: if A borrows 100 million dollars for 10 years at a fixed interest rate of 5%, the first year he will repay a tenth of the capital initially borrowed (10 million dollars) plus 5% of the capital owed, i.e. 5 million dollars, that is a total of 15 million dollars. In the second year, he will again repay 10% of the capital borrowed, but the 5% now only applies to the remaining 90 million dollars still due, i.e. 4.5 million dollars, or a total of 14.5 million dollars. And so on, until the tenth year when he will repay the last 10 million dollars, plus 5% of that remaining 10 million dollars, i.e. 0.5 million dollars, giving a total of 10.5 million dollars. Over 10 years, the total amount repaid will come to 127.5 million dollars. The repayment of the capital is not usually made in equal instalments. In the initial years, the repayment concerns mainly the interest, and the proportion of capital repaid increases over the years. In this case, if repayments are stopped, the capital still due is higher…

The nominal interest rate is the rate at which the loan is contracted. The real interest rate is the nominal rate reduced by the rate of inflation. . It has recommended that Pakistan gradually reduce subsidies in the power industry as well as salaries and pension costs. Pension reform is also one of the major priorities for the IMF.

While Pakistan has averted an imminent default, Farooq Tariq adds : “the state has already defaulted in various aspects. The Covid-19 pandemic led to an increase of 20 million people living below the poverty line, and the recent austerity measures implemented by the government since April 2022 have added another 10 million to that count. While there was a 35% wage increase for public sector employees (who had demanded a 100% increase), no relief was provided to workers in the private sector. According to a conservative estimate by the World Bank, the poverty rate in Pakistan is expected to reach 37.2 percent ($3.65 a day).”

According to Oxfam, the country’s top 1% is wealthier than the bottom 70% of the population. This wealth disparity has far-reaching ramifications for the country’s economic and social development. The statistics and figures on wealth inequality in Pakistan are mind-boggling. According to a World Inequality Database analysis, the top 10% of Pakistani households earn 42% of the country’s income, while the lowest 50% earn only 13%. This means that the richest households in Pakistan earn more than three times as much as the lowest. When it comes to wealth rather than income, the issue is much more pronounced. According to the Oxfam research, the top 1% of Pakistani households own 21.9% of the country’s wealth, while the lowest 50% control only 4.4%. This means that Pakistan’s wealthiest households have more than five times the wealth of the poorest households. These wealth and income discrepancies have serious implications for the country’s economic and social development. The IMF accord will almost certainly not help the country improve its predicament.

Instead of focusing on the people they govern, successive governments and regimes have ironically shifted the debt load onto Pakistan’s working classes, as dictated by international financial organisations. Sadly enough, these have made the lives of ordinary folks more miserable.